Blog

Unlocking the Potential of Organoids in Screening Applications 

Physiological relevance versus reproducibilityAs scientists, we all recognize the limitations of developing assays using 2D immortalized cell lines and thus have dedicated our careers to developing cellular models that more closely recapitulate in vivo biology.  The reality is, with each step we take down the path of complexity—primary cells, co-culture, 3D models—we also introduce new challenges associated with heterogeneity and variability that must be addressed to generate robust and reproducible data.  

Organoid brain

Scientists in the fields of research and therapeutic discovery have recognized the potential of organoid models to transform and accelerate basic and translational research programs, regenerative medicine, and preclinical pipelines. These stem-cell derived 3D models offer greater physiological relevance over other models because: 

  • Organoids differentiate and self-organize into miniature 3D structures that more closely mimic the microenvironment and cellular diversity of tissues.  
  • Organoid-forming stem cells can be isolated from a variety of sources, including normal and diseased tissue and induced pluripotent stem cells, and the organoids maintain stable genomic and phenotypic profiles.  
  • They can be derived quickly, making them useful for broad preclinical or patient-specific drug screening. 

Despite these promising advantages of organoids, there are a host of technical challenges associated with culture methods, as well as analytical limitations, that prevent organoids from being more widely adopted as high-throughput cellular models early in the drug discovery pipeline.   

 

Common pain points in organoid culture  

There are two main reasons organoid cultures present challenges in cell-based assays 1) establishment of reproducible cultures, and 2) population heterogeneity. Most organoid models rely on extracellular matrix (ECM) to form 3D structures. Seeding organoids into ECM droplets, or domes, is an incredibly laborious process that relies on precise pipetting, temperature control, and expert users.  Even with a developed SOP and well-trained hands, these experimental nuances cause a spectrum of variability between wells, such as organoid number, dome size and placement in the well.  In addition to well-to-well variability, organoid domes containing 10s to 100s of organoids are heterogenous themselves, which presents challenges in imaging and analysis, such as (Figure 1): 

  • Multifocal imaging requirements and overlapping structures 
  • Heterogeneity in size and growth rates 
  • Viability inconsistencies 
  • Endpoints are limited to pooled readouts

 

Picture1

 Figure 1. Organoids grown in a dome of ECM have large population variability, including size and viability inconsistencies, require multifocal imaging, and are limited to pooled readouts. 

 

Ultimately, data generated from these heterogenous populations of organoids often mask or misrepresent the biological response.  Because of these challenges, establishing reproducible organoids for both inter- and intra-experiment consistency is perhaps the biggest barrier preventing these models from being useful for moderate-to-high throughput screening assays.   

One approach to evaluating population heterogeneity is to use imaging and advanced analysis to evaluate individual organoid responses. To interrogate single organoid responses to a drug or other perturbation, a researcher would need hi-tech imaging instrumentation and analytical tools to parse out single-organoid imaging data from a population of organoids.  Unfortunately, if further evaluation of individual organoids in the population is necessary, your experiment has reached the end of the line—the organoids you’ve spent a great deal of time and effort to evaluate using image analysis are stuck, along with all the other organoids you may or may not care about, inside the ECM dome.   

What if there was a way to escape the dome? 

 

Outside the Dome: A novel culture method for organoids 

Improving the scalability, efficiency, and reproducibility of organoid models for screening applications is one of the biggest challenges researchers face in using these complex 3D models for their research and discovery programs. The CellRaft® Technology offers a unique solution to many of the pain points researchers face in their organoid workflows. Using the core technology, the CellRaft® Array, and the CellRaft AIR® System, users can: 

  • Grow and maintain hundreds of individual organoids ​on a single CellRaft Array 
  • Perform automated imaging to capture serial images of each organoid over time​ 
  • Use software tools to phenotypically characterize and identify individual organoids of interest​ 
  • Isolate single, intact organoids for downstream use, including screening assays, further propagation, and lytic endpoints, such as -omics


Picture2

 Figure 2. Organoids cultured on the CellRaft Array.  Field-of-view images, acquired on the CellRaft AIR System, have been stitched together to generate a representative image of the entire CellRaft Array.  Green circles highlight every CellRaft in the array containing a single organoid that can be imaged, analyzed, and isolated for downstream use. 

 

Use Case Data 

To demonstrate the ability of the CellRaft AIR System to produce intra-assay consistency for organoid screening assays, we grew, serially imaged, and used software tools to identify organoids of interest for isolation.  To decrease the size heterogeneity of the downstream screening assay, software tools were used to identify two populations of organoids. The first population was created to identify CellRafts with single organoids, irrespective of size, and the second was created to identify single organoids ranging from 300-500 microns in diameter (Figure 3).  CellRafts with organoids of interest were isolated into 96-well plates to generate variable and size-selected plates for downstream drug toxicity screening assays (Figure 4).  For detailed experimental design and resulting drug toxicity data see our Organoid RaftNote.   

In summary, the data demonstrate that using the CellRaft AIR system we were able to reduce variability in replicate wells using size-selected organoids resulting in dose-response curves that could be translated to ED50 data, which was not possible from the parallel assay with variable-sized organoids. These data highlight the importance of well-to-well consistency, and the ability of CellRaft Technology to provide a solution to this challenge of organoid screening assays. 

 

Picture3
Figure 3.
Select organoids for isolation based on phenotypic and morphologic characteristics to generate intra- and inter- assay consistency.  To demonstrate the importance of organoid size in single-organoid screening assays, populations were created to represent variable-sized organoids greater than 50um (A), and the second was selected for organoids ranging from 300-500um in diameter.  

 

Picture4
Figure 4.
The CellRaft AIR System performs automated isolation of CellRafts containing pre-selected organoids of interest into 96-well plates for downstream use, such as drug screening. 

 

Lessons Learned 

Using the CellRaft AIR System, we have developed workflows and generated data that demonstrate widespread organoid applications.  Here, we’ve introduced the key features, such as reliable temporal imaging of hundreds of individual organoids, software-guided selection of organoids of interest, and automated isolation of single organoids for downstream use, that enable efficient and reproducible organoid screening assays.  To learn more about how the CellRaft technology can transform organoid workflows, visit our webpage and follow our blog for future organoid content.  

 

Learn more about CellRaft Technology. 

 

 

Allysa Stern Ph.D
Allysa Stern, Ph.D.

Dr. Stern obtained a Ph.D. and Master of Science in Physiology from North Carolina State University and a Bachelor of Science in Animal Science. Her background is in comparative physiology, with a concentration in cell biology and developing 2D and 3D in vitro models for drug and toxicological studies. Dr. Stern is currently a scientist on the Product Applications team at Cell Microsystems where she focuses on developing novel 2D and 3D cellular workflows using the CellRaft Technology and provides customer training and support for 3D workflows using the CellRaft AIR System.   

Related Posts

Unlocking the Secrets of Antibiotic Resistance: How Shear Flow Systems Are Revolutionizing the Fight Against Superbugs
Unlocking the Secrets of Antibiotic Resistance: How Shear Flow Systems Are Revolutionizing the Fight Against Superbugs

In the ongoing battle against antibiotic-resistant bacteria, or “superbugs,” scientists are constantly seeking innovative tools to understand the mechanisms of resistance and develop effective treatments. One such groundbreaking technology is shear flow systems, which have emerged as game-changers in microbiological research. By simulating the dynamic conditions of bacteria’s natural environments, such as the human body or food processing, shear flow systems provide unique insights into bacterial behavior and resistance mechanisms that traditional static methods simply cannot achieve. In this blog post, we’ll explore the benefits of using shear flow systems to combat antibiotic resistance and develop next-generation therapies.

Why Shear Flow Systems Are Essential for Studying Antibiotic Resistance

Antibiotic resistance is a complex phenomenon influenced by a variety of factors, including genetic mutations, horizontal gene transfer, and the formation of biofilms. Traditional laboratory methods often fail to capture the dynamic nature of these processes, leading to incomplete or misleading results. Shear flow systems address this limitation by providing a more realistic environment for bacterial growth and interaction. Here’s how:

1. Mimicking Real-World Conditions

In the human body, bacteria are rarely in a static state. They are constantly exposed to fluid flow, such as blood circulation or urine flow, which influences their behavior and resistance mechanisms. Shear flow systems can replicate these conditions, allowing researchers to study how bacteria respond to antibiotics under realistic physiological conditions. This is critical for understanding how resistance develops and persists in vivo. This benefit was recently highlighted in a webinar presented by Dr. Katharina Richter, a microbiology researcher from the University of Adelaide in Australia. Using a high-throughput BioFlux Shear Flow System, Dr. Richter and her team were able to test 3 different methods of superbug treatments under physiological conditions.

2. Studying Biofilm Formation and Resistance

Biofilms—structured communities of bacteria encased in a protective matrix—are a major contributor to antibiotic resistance. Biofilms are notoriously difficult to treat because they shield bacteria from antibiotics and the immune system. Shear flow systems enable researchers to study biofilm formation in real time, observing how bacteria adhere to surfaces, form microcolonies, and develop resistance under flow conditions. For example, using a BioFlux, Dr. Richter was able to leverage high-resolution imaging to obtain unprecedented insight into the biofilm killing and prevention efficacy of a copper and diethyldithiocarbamate (DDC) combination nanoparticles¹. The group is currently investigating the use of a Cu-DDC infused gel that can be injected into wounds that are at high risk for chronic infection, such as hernia.

From Milliliters to Microliters: How a Shear Flow System Can Reduce Sample Requirements for Experiments
From Milliliters to Microliters: How a Shear Flow System Can Reduce Sample Requirements for Experiments

Imagine working with a rare patient-derived cell samples. In a traditional setup, you might need 1 milliliter of sample (equivalent to about 20 drops) to run an experiment. With a microfluidic system, you could potentially get the same results with just 10 microliters (about one-half of a single drop). This efficiency opens up entirely new research possibilities, especially in fields where sample availability is a limiting factor.

Whether due to rarity, cost, or difficulty in obtaining samples, the ability to conduct meaningful experiments with limited sample volumes has long been a goal in biological and chemical research. In this quest for more efficient and precise laboratory techniques, microfluidic shear flow systems have emerged as game-changing tools. These systems are not only reducing the amount of sample required for experiments but are also proving their versatility across a wide range of sample types.

Sample volume

Traditional experimental setups, including static and non-microfluidic shear flow, often demand significant amounts of material, which can be both costly and impractical. This is especially true when working with precious or limited samples such as rare biological specimens, expensive chemicals, or newly synthesized compounds. Enter microfluidic shear flow systems – an elegant solution that’s revolutionizing how investigators approach assays. These miniaturized platforms are proving invaluable across multiple disciplines by dramatically reducing sample requirements from milliliters down to microliters, while maintaining experimental integrity. This up to 1000-fold reduction in sample volume is particularly crucial when working with substances, such as patient-derived cells or novel pharmaceuticals. By significantly reducing the volume of reagents and samples needed, these systems cut costs and make experiments more sustainable.

Sample versatility

Equally as impressive as their sample and reagent reduction ability, is the versatility of microfluidic shear flow systems to adapt to different types of samples.

  • Human Samples: Researchers can study cellular behavior under controlled shear stress, mimicking physiological conditions such as blood or saliva flow.
  • Nanomaterials: The precise fluid dynamics in these systems allow for the uniform dispersion and manipulation of nanoparticles, enabling high-resolution studies in materials science.
  • Microbes: Continuous fluid flow more closely represents the natural environments of many microbes, such as plumbing, food processing, and chronic wounds.

The ability to work with multiple sample types in the same system allows researchers to explore different experimental conditions without the need for multiple specialized setups. By precisely controlling channel geometries and flow rates, researchers can subject different sample types to well-defined shear conditions, enabling detailed studies of cellular mechanics, protein interactions, and material properties.

Microfluidic…
Single Cells: Lab Tune Sung to the Rhythm of "Jingle Bells"
Single Cells: Lab Tune Sung to the Rhythm of "Jingle Bells"

By Jessica Hartman, Ph.D.

Toiling in the lab

With a deadline on its way

To the scope I go

On a Saturday

I don’t see a clone

I’ve looked for one that’s right

What misery these data bring,

I’ll have to look all night,

Oh! Single cells, single cells, dilutions aren’t the way

Oh, I wish I had an AIR to pick a clone, to-da-ay!

Single cells, single cells, I need a better way

Use a Raft to grow a clone or be sad this holiday!

Use a Raft to grow a clone or be sad this holiday!

Now it’s getting late

My spirits are so low

My PI will hate

If my cells don’t grow

My eyesight’s getting dim

A clone I cannot see

My chances are so slim

I need CellRaft Cytometry

Oh! Single cells, single cells, sorters aren’t the way

Oh, I wish I had an AIR to pick a clone, to-da-ay!

Single cells, single cells, I need a better way

Use a Raft to grow a clone or be sad this holiday!

Use a Raft to grow a clone or be sad this holiday!

Oh! Single cells, single cells, dispensers aren’t the way

Oh, I wish I had an AIR to pick a clone, to-da-ay!

Single cells, single cells, I need a better way

Use a Raft to grow a clone or be sad this holiday!

Use a Raft to grow a clone or be sad this holiday!

 

 

 

 “Single Cell” vocalist: Virginia Laurie

Jessica Hartman, Ph.D.Senior Director of Product Applications | jessica.hartman@cellmicrosystems.comDr. Jessica Hartman has a B.S in Biology from the University…